Moscow's recent
efforts to tackle the Islamic State and other extremist groups trying to
overthrow the legitimate government in Syria have turned into "something
close to a diplomatic triumph" leaving Barack Obama "looking weak and
confused," British journalist Owen Matthews noted.
Russia's success could be attributed to a number of factors.
For one thing, Vladimir Putin "knows who his allies are — and, no less importantly, who his enemies are," as Owen put it. Washington and London do not support any major group taking part in the bloody civil war and they have been struggling to find what they referred to as "moderate" fighters to oppose Assad.
Another major reason stems
from the fact that the Kremlin was right about the implications
of the so-called Arab Spring uprisings and "America and Britain were
dead wrong," the journalist noted. "Regime change doesn't seem to have
changed Middle Eastern countries for the better, as Vladimir Putin
has been warning for years."
Owen also emphasized that unlike the US
with its major ground presence in the Middle East, Russia opted
for a "minuscule" operation that appears to be a smart
choice.
"With this relatively small military force, Putin
has achieved remarkable diplomatic leverage — and halted any renewed
western attempts to depose Assad," the journalist observed in an
article titled "How Putin outwitted the West." He also warned
of unpredictable results that air campaigns could yield, citing NATO's
experience in Libya.
Owen also maintains that one of Putin's aims
in Syria "is to hold up Britain and America as paper
tigers whose indecision has created a policy vacuum on Syria,
into which Putin has confidently stepped. The Russian operation is small
and portable enough for Putin to be able to roll it up in a
week — and declare victory if and when the going gets tough. That,
as he knows, is more than Britain and America have been able
to do in any of our recent wars."
Source: Sputnik News 10-10-2015
