Friday 31 July 2015

In Ukraine Enormous Rise in Gangsterism Since Maidan



  • Daylight kidnappings, killings and robberies
  • Serious crime was up 90% in 2014
  • The cause is weak central authority that has forsaken a monopoly on force
  • People are sick of it - but it’s unclear what they can do

This article originally appeared at CounterPunch

A girl was abducted last month by an unknown person on Independence [Maidan] Square in Kyiv on a Sunday evening. This was reported on the traffic police website:

“Kiev. Girl kidnapped, Independence Square. A girl was forced into a car, which fled in the direction of a pedestrian zone. 06/14/2015, 21:40. BMW 5 Series, AK6068CI, dark color. Information of the Kiev State Automobile Inspectorate.”

On the same day, a 16-year-old girl was kidnapped in the Ivano-Frankivsk Region, as reported by the press service of the regional administration of the Interior Ministry: 

“On June 14, around 1:30 am on the road between the villages of Rosokhach and Vinograd in Gorodenkovskii district, an unknown person forced a girl into a VAZ (Lada) car and drove off in an unknown direction. Her current whereabouts are unknown.”

Earlier, in the Donetsk Region, in Slavyansk, occupied by Ukrainian troops, a local resident told the police that her son had been abducted. This was the report by a law enforcement source:

“The woman went to the Slavyansk police on June 10 and stated that a group of people had grabbed her 20 year old son in the street. According to the woman, her son was taken to an unknown destination.”

On June 12 (line 102 of the police report), an operations duty officer was informed that near the Troeschina Market in Kiev, an unknown person held a man in a car, demanding money. When law officers arrived on the scene, they saw a young man lying on the ground with no signs of life. Doctors pronounced him dead.

On June 1, eight year old Nastya Bobkova was abducted in her yard in Zaporozhye. On June 13, she was found dead on the island of Khortytsya in a forest plantation, near a training base belonging to Ukrainian neo-Nazis.

In social networks were reports of a search for missing student Jana Dmitrikova of the Zaporozhye Aviation College. The girl was returning home from work late at night on June 13 but never made it home.

Sixteen year old Susanna Sharkova, who had been missing, was found murdered in a private home in the Shevchenko district of Zaporozhye on March 11.

June 8, an unknown person driving a black Mercedes kidnapped a girl in Kostelni Street in Kiev. This was reported by the Ukrainian Ministry of the Interior.

On May 19, according to the aforementioned site, a girl was kidnapped in the Obolonskiy District of Kiev by an unknown person driving a Mercedes.

All of these messages resemble reports from the front lines of war. Serious crimes occur almost every day in Ukraine, most of which remain unsolved. Kidnappings in broad daylight, vehicle hijackings, robberies ‒ all of this has become commonplace in the country that won the “revolution of dignity” on Maidan Square.

In 2014, Ukraine registered more than one million criminal offenses, a nearly 90% increase in the number of serious crimes–most of them in the capital city of Kyiv.

The number of robberies since the beginning of this year is twice that of the same period of 2014. Almost all involved weapons. In the view of the president of the Ukrainian Federation of Security Professionals, Sergei Shabovta, the cause of this sharp increase in the number of armed assaults is a drastic rise in social tension and a large number of illegal firearms.

“In the first quarter of this year alone,” said Shabovta, “the number of crimes of violence involving the use of weapons has more than tripled. This statistic is, unfortunately, sometimes hidden from the public by the law enforcement system.”

The expert explained that in Ukraine, there has been an increase in the number of people suffering depression. 

Many of those have been left homeless and destitute. In addition, Shabovta noted a significant increase in illegal arms trafficking. There is information that Kiev is experiencing sharp increases in trafficked weapons from the so-called ATO zone (referring to the ‘Anti Terrorist Operation’ of the Ukraine government against Russian-language fighters in eastern Ukraine).

As reported by ‘Aydar’ battalion Chief of Staff Valentin Likholit to the correspondent of the Ukrainian edition of Vesti, weapons from the war zone are entering Kyiv both for sale and as backups for emergencies.

“It works like this: thugs associate themselves with brokers, who then organize the delivery,” he said.

Most buyers want to buy Makarov (PM) and Tokarev (TT) combat pistols and cartridges, and grenades. Sellers offer “to obtain any weapons”, showing the items in photos. In today’s Ukraine, guns are easy to order for home delivery, even via social networks.

Incidentally, many mass media outlets already compare Ukraine with Dudayev’s Chechnya. We all know what happened to the nearly-forgotten ‘Ichkeria’.[1]

Most of the population became tired of thuggish lawlessness and supported an anti-terrorist operation by Russian troops and a return to the legal domain of the Republic of Russia.

According to analyst Vasily Muravitskiy, the main reason behind the worsening of the criminal situation in Ukraine is the destruction of the continuity of power.

“The situation is such that the power in the country is lying in the dust. In the minds of thousands of people, there is the impression that they can just pick it up and use it. The government has given up the most important responsibility of power: it has ceded the right to use force to self-organized, semi-bandit battalions, some of which, like ‘Azov’ and ‘Aydar’, are recognized even abroad as fascist bandits.

“The state is unable to stop this because what remains of the state apparatus is directly involved in the mayhem. 

Take, for example, the appearance of a right-radical extremist organization at the building of the press-secretary of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine. He had come to support the chief of the SBU, Valentin Nalyvaychenko, who was summoned for questioning.

“Consider the pictures of burning oil depots, where lunches for the fire brigades were brought by volunteers instead of the state.

“The ‘Maidan’ government has launched a mechanism for the collapse of the state at the highest government level. Therefore, the ‘Ichkerization’ of Ukraine will continue. But the main problem is not even Ichkerization but, rather, the fact that in Ukraine today, there is not a single real force that could, or would want to, oppose the banditization of the country and its transformation into a free-for-all.”

Political analyst Victor Shapinov also believes that Ichkerization of Ukraine has already taken place.

“Speaking of the lawlessness of armed men, a substitute for the state, it has already happened. And it all started right on the ‘Maidan’, where the nationalists seized the House of Trade Unions and the Ukrainian House [convention center] and the first thing they did was to create makeshift prisons and torture chambers.

“Even the ‘post-Maidan’ rule, which relies heavily on the terror of paramilitary groups, had to struggle with extreme manifestations of Ichkerization. Let us recall the elimination of one of the extremist leaders, Muzychko.[2] The process goes on.

“A recent example was the robbing of a gas station by ATO veterans who killed two police officers as they attempted to arrest them.[3] This is a case where employees of law enforcement agencies at least tried to stop the lawlessness of the “national heroes”. But how many cases might there be when the police were afraid to intervene?”

Svobodnaya Pressa (SP): Can we say that the state is neglecting its responsibility to protect civilians?

“This state did not declare this goal. It is not responsible to the citizens. But it is always ready to answer to their sponsors in the West. Some people have openly said: ‘If you are dissatisfied with something, you are agents of a foreign enemy.’ I’m not exaggerating. See statements by officials in Kiev. Look at the central television channels to see for yourself.”

SP: Will we come to the point that the majority of Ukrainians, like most residents of Chechnya at the beginning of the 2000s, will welcome troops who can put an end to the lawlessness?

“I think the picture is more complex than that. But before the militia of Donbass is greeted with flowers in the cities of central Ukraine, the Lugansk People’s Republic (LPR) and the Donetsk People’s Republic (DPR) must set an example by successfully building up a welfare state against the backdrop of a Ukraine plunging into the abyss. Of course, some progress has been made in this respect. For example, the nationalization of a number of important enterprises in the breakaway republics.

“But for now, there is still a question whether state-building will continue in Donbas. After all, there are the Minsk agreements stipulating that the LPR and DPR must return to Ukrainian jurisdiction. Meanwhile, to restore order in the country, there must be a clear-cut alternative to official Kiev. And not only a military alternative but also a political and ideological one.”

Ukrainian historian Vladimir Kornilov, director of the Center for Eurasian Studies, recalls that most armed crimes committed in Ukraine are now perpetrated by punitive forces that have been at the front. “As a result of the massacre unleashed a year ago by Kiev, arms are spreading around the country uncontrolled. Gangs formed under the guise of “volunteer battalions” (note, even the Prosecutor General of Ukraine has recognized that ‘Aydar’ is a gang) are now completely unchecked. And it would have been strange if all this had not led to a sharp increase in crime. The exponential growth in crime was birthed by ‘Maidan’ itself.”

SP: Why can’t the authorities do anything?

“What can we expect from the authorities, born with the aid of gangster methods? This government understands that without war, it would be swept away. All its efforts are aimed solely at trying to contain its gangs in Donbas, where criminals with weapons in their hands can do all sorts of crimes, while not allowing them to rampage too much in the rest of Ukraine.

“But even Kiev understands that these efforts are fruitless. Looters returning from the front cannot live and earn by any other means. The Kiev government consists of minions who live by the principle of the French proverb: ‘After us – the deluge’.”

SP: What is the likelihood of obtaining the consent of citizens for whatever power that can deliver them from the mayhem?

“The kind of chaos and lawlessness that now reigns in Ukraine always generates a desire among citizens for a ‘strong hand’ [to control it]. The political slant of this ‘hand’ usually does not worry the populace very much…”

This piece was originally published published in Svobonaya Pressa[Free Press], July 23, 2015.

Translator’s notes:

[1] Dzhokhar Musayevich Dudayev was the first president of the ‘Chechen Republic of Ichkeria’ from 1991 until his death in 1996. He was killed by Russian armed forces.
[2] Aleksandr Muzychko was shot and killed by Ukrainian police in March 2014.
[3] Two police officers were killed and three others were hospitalized by automatic gunfire in the early hours of Sunday, May 3 as they gave chase to two gunmen who had robbed a gas station. The gunmen and their accomplices were members of several neo-Nazi battalions, including ‘Aidar’ and ‘Azov’. Among the accomplices later arrested was 19 year old Vera Zaverukha.

Translation to English by Don Hank for CounterPunch.
 
Source: Russia Insider 31-07-2015

Thursday 30 July 2015

Russian deputy says initiators of motion on MH17 tribunal sought confrontation, hysteria



A new spiral of information war against Russia has been launched, deputy Frants Klintsevich, a member of the Duma committee for defense believes

MOSCOW, June 29. /TASS/. Initiators of the motion to set up a tribunal for criminal prosecution of the people guilty of Malaysia Airlines’ flight MH17 crash over eastern Ukraine were seeking to fan confrontation and hysteria in reality rather than to get truth about the tragedy, deputy Frants Klintsevich, a member of the Duma committee for defense told reporters on Wednesday.


"A new spiral of information war against Russia has been launched," he said.

"What was to happen has happened and there can be no questions to Russia in this situation," Klintsevich said.

"By vetoing the resolution on a UN tribunal for MH17, Russia used the right it has as a permanent member of the UN Security Council," he said.

"Once again, we should praise the farsightedness of the founding fathers of the UN, who realized that truth far from always stays with the majority," Klintsevich said.

Klintsevich said he was confident this resolution was not to be considered by the UN Security Council even on purely formal grounds.

"Appropriate documents clearly state all the prerogatives of the council and the MH17 case doesn’t match the list in any way," Klintsevich said. "The problem is the West has long sacrificed legal formalities for political stratagems."

"It’s obvious that the setting up of a tribunal won’t take investigation of the essence of the case an inch ahead," he said. "We’re dealing with a sheer propaganda action that seeks to affect the public opinion, which is gradually inclining towards cooperation with Russia."

The UN Security Council failed to endorse a resolution on criminal prosecution of the people responsible for the crash of flight MH17. A total of eleven members of the Council voted in favor of the resolution — the number of votes sufficient for its endorsement, but Russia used its right to veto and blocked the document.

Another three countries — Angola, Venezuela and China — abstained from voting.

Malaysia Airlines’ Boeing 777-200ER crashed on July 17, 2014, in the east of Ukraine’s much-troubled embattled Donetsk region while performing flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur. All the 283 passengers and 15 crew members died.

It is widely believed that it might have been brought down by a surface-to-air or air-to-air missile.

Source: ITAR-TASS 30-07-2015

Wednesday 29 July 2015

MH 17: The unanswered questions



Western media sources were quick to point the finger at "Russian-backed rebels" operating in Eastern Ukraine, operating a "Russian missile system" to down the Malaysian Airlines flight MH 17 in July 2014. Even the name of Russia's President was invoked...all without a shred of evidence one year on. Here are some questions to be answered.

1. To make an accusation, you need proof. Without the proof, the accusation amounts to slander or libel. The official enquiry has not yet delivered any hard evidence pointing towards Russia's involvement in the incident, either passively or actively. Therefore are accusations to the contrary, without evidence to back them up, simply examples of slander and libel levelled by those who have lied time and time and time and time and time again?

2. OCSE monitor Michael Bociurkiw in an interview shortly after the incident on July 17 that there are two or three pieces of fuselage which show indications of heavy machine-gun fire and no evidence of missile damage. How to explain this?

3. The same monitor declared later that certain pieces of the fuselage looked different a few days after he had first seen them. On July 22, he stated to the BBC that certain sections of the fuselage "do look different than when we first saw them". 

Was the wreckage tampered with?

4. What about the eye-witness reports of two Ukrainian Air Force fighter jets trailing the plane at the time of the incident?

Impact holes do not match BUK M1 missile

5. How to explain the circular holes bend inwards at impact, when such holes are made by bullets from machine-gun fire? Shrapnel from a BUK missile system would have caused tears in the fuselage more of a triangular shape and would not have concentrated on and targeted the cockpit specifically. 

Furthermore, fuselage sections on another part of the aircraft have outward-bent impact marks, showing that the MH-17 was being fired at from two different directions.

6. The caliber of the round bullet holes is from a 30-mm. cannon. If the aircraft was downed by a surface-to-air missile, then how could this produce bullet holes from a machine-gun?

7. The fuselage has other marks besides those of machine-gin fire. Was the aircraft hit by an air-to-air missile as well as machine-gun fire from two different sides from the two aircraft said to be trailing it at the time of impact?

8. Why have fragments of information disclaiming the western theory that pro-Russian or Russian-backed rebels were responsible disappeared from the Internet? Why have Facebook accounts showing such evidence been closed down? Why have blog sites carrying evidence disclaiming the western theory been hacked? Why do stories such as these attract an army of Internet trolls making ad hominem attacks against the author, sending threatening emails to her/his email account and vehemently shrieking abuse and lies without discussing any of the points in question?

9. If a guided missile launched by a BUK-M1 Surface to Air Missile battery leaves a comet-like plume of smoke behind it, and given that no such plume was seen at the time of impact against MH 17, during daylight, would this not point towards the fact that the object responsible for the incident was not, in fact, a BUK missile system?

Turn on your microphones, copy and paste this link into a fresh browser window and watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPtDy18Nk5I

10. If the impact holes on the aircraft show impact from below and sideways, then how does this implicate a BUK missile system, which strikes the target from above?

11. Looking at the video, how can a complex system costing millions and involving different control vehicles be operated by "rebels"?

Aircraft seen trailing MH-17

12. How to explain that eye witnesses saw aircraft trailing MH17, and then shots, without any missile trail, just before the aircraft exploded?

13. Is there any credence in the theory that President Putin was believed to be flying over the same route at the time? Malaysia Airlines confirms  "A flight from a different carrier was on the same route at the time of the MH17 incident". Sources who have asked not to be named have claimed that the Russian President's aircraft has very similar contours and coloring to MH17 and that both aircraft intersected at the same point and altitude at a similar time. It was 200 miles behind MH 17. In the event it did not fly over Ukraine, but the trajectory could have fooled those who wanted to murder President Putin?

14. And how to make sense of this? Kiev's wrath against anti-Kiev commander Bes was well known. Bes operated precisely in the area of the downed jetliner. Then there was the video tape of a supposed conversation between him and subordinates, uploaded five hours after the crash but placing the time of the crash 35 minutes before it actually took place. The log of the video shows it was made on July 16, so one day before the incident took place? Fabricated false flag "evidence"?

15. The video of a recorded conversation between a Ukrainian military pilot and command flying in the area at the same time regarding a downed aircraft has since disappeared from the Net. Why?

Anti-Fascist forces did not have equipment or know-how

16. The BUK M-1 is a sophisticated piece of weaponry that can only be operated by a team of experts, involving training for months. Such personnel know the difference between a civilian and a military aircraft. Coupled with this, the anti-Kiev freedom fighters in the area possess missile systems that do not operate over 10,000 feet. The MH-17 was flying at 33,000 feet.

17. Why was the aircraft flying over a war zone, where ten aircraft had been downed recently?

18. Why does the downed aircraft show cladding damage characteristic with pin and shrapnel warheads (air-to-air systems), much more characteristic of R-27 TOPOR or R-73 missiles used on the Ukraine military MIG-29 and SU-27 aircraft?

19. One year on, where is the official report? Does it really take that long to doctor the evidence?

20. Given the recent history of geopolitical events and given the following, would anyone put any of the questions raised above beyond NATO in general and the FUKUS Axis (France-UK-US) in particular?

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda.Ru  


 *Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey has worked as a correspondent, journalist, deputy editor, editor, chief editor, director, project manager, executive director, partner and owner of printed and online daily, weekly, monthly and yearly publications, TV stations and media groups printed, aired and distributed in Angola, Brazil, Cape Verde, East Timor, Guinea-Bissau, Portugal, Mozambique and São Tomé and Principe Isles; the Russian Foreign Ministry publication Dialog and the Cuban Foreign Ministry Official Publications. He has spent the last two decades in humanitarian projects, connecting communities, working to document and catalog disappearing languages, cultures, traditions, working to network with the LGBT communities helping to set up shelters for abused or frightened victims and as Media Partner with UN Women, working to foster the UN Women project to fight against gender violence and to strive for an end to sexism, racism and homophobia. He is also a Media Partner of Humane Society International, fighting for animal rights.

Source: English Pravda 29-07-2015