Wednesday 18 June 2014

Total war and guerrilla war; two parallel options



With the struggle against the fascist Kiev army in the eastern Ukraine continuing, it is important tot note that the self defence forces can employ other tactics than those currently used. At the moment the tactics used in and around the towns in the eastern area are those of a regular army. This is no problem when you have plenty of soldiers and hardware, but if the enemy is outnumbering you and using war crimes against the fighters and civilians, guerrilla warfare should be considered as a parallel option. This type of warfare could be employed against the Kiev army in the east, but also against legitimate targets in the rest of the Ukraine.

With the areas in the east under heavy attack from the fascist army, whereby phosphorous bombs, air strikes and heavy artillery are used, the urgent need is to relief the pressure. This means that the Kiev army, but also other targets, can be attacked anywhere in the Ukraine so that they do not feel safe, even in their own backyards. Some small active service units made up of fighters from the east or supporters from other parts of the Ukraine can be deployed around the country to cause havoc and chaos to reduce the pressure from the Kiev regime on the east. This does not mean abandoning the current defence of the towns held by the self defence forces, using guerrilla tactics just adds another string to the bow of the resistance.

The advantage of guerrilla warfare is that a regular army has very little chance of defeating a guerrilla organisation. There are a number of examples of this. These tactics are used by both the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Both the British Army and the Turkish Army have admitted after years of trying that they could not defeat the guerrilla groups. They could only contain the situation and suffer casualties in the meantime. In the case of the IRA, volunteers are continuing the struggle, despite a treacherous peace treaty, until this very day. The rulers have not been able to stop them. The PKK is on ceasefire at the moment, but the guerrilla army in the mountains is still intact and fights back whenever it is attacked, or when the Turkish fascists attack the Kurdish people.

In the Ukraine guerrilla tactics would be very successful. The Kiev system is in itself unstable and would collapse into chaos when certain institutions and targets are attacked. The attacks would be completely legitimate because the Kiev fascists are using terror tactics in the east, and this means that people have the right under international law to defend themselves. The main thing is not to attack people in general but to go for well chosen targets such as gas pipelines, military posts and personnel, politicians responsible for the terror in the east, and, it speaks for itself that all fascist organisations and their members are legitimate targets. These are enemies of the people and should wiped out.

A guerrilla campaign can be kept going for years and can be very damaging for a regime like the one in Kiev. A necessary condition is a strong base among the people for the fighters, and there can be very little doubt that this base exists in the eastern parts of the Ukraine. Weapons and explosives are also available, so in fact everything is already in place.

The aim of the campaign would be to force the Kiev fascists to hand the areas in the east over to the local people as is their wish. The choice has been made in a referendum. The guerrilla campaign must be so costly to Kiev that it becomes willing to give in because maintaining their own control would be more trouble that it is worth. A victory can be achieved in this way, as history has proved. In Ukraine especially the gas supplies, the pipelines and the storage facilities could be the first main targets.

It is likely that the self defence forces have already decided to employ guerrilla tactics and that this article is running behind the facts on the ground. That would be very good. But sometimes it helps when comrades, who are not directly involved join the thinking process. That is the aim of this short article. We expect that every contribution is welcome.

Source: The Red Banner Focus on Russia www.theredbanner.blogspot.nl