"Obviously, it is a flagrant
violation of liabilities under the INF Treaty," the ministry stressed.
MOSCOW, April 29. /TASS/. The United States’ deployment of its Aegis Ashore anti-missile systems in Eastern Europe is a flagrant violation of Washington’s liabilities under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty), the Russian foreign ministry said on Saturday commenting on latest report of the US Department of State on countries’ observance of their liabilities in the sphere of weapons control and non-proliferation.
MOSCOW, April 29. /TASS/. The United States’ deployment of its Aegis Ashore anti-missile systems in Eastern Europe is a flagrant violation of Washington’s liabilities under the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF Treaty), the Russian foreign ministry said on Saturday commenting on latest report of the US Department of State on countries’ observance of their liabilities in the sphere of weapons control and non-proliferation.
"The
United States has deployed Aegis Ashore anti-missile systems at its base in
Romania and plans to deploy another such system in Poland. Such systems
incorporate vertical launch systems similar to Mk-41 universal systems that are
capable of launching intermediate-range cruise missiles Tomahawk," the
ministry noted.
"Obviously,
it is a flagrant violation of liabilities under the INF Treaty," the
ministry stressed.
According
to the ministry, this is not the only section of the treaty where Washington is
failing its liabilities. Thus, for more than two decades, the United States has
been continuing tests with the use target missiles having the same
characteristics as ground-based short-and medium-range ballistic missiles to
improve elements of the systems prohibited by the INF Treaty. More to it,
Washington is boosting production and the use of unmanned fighting vehicles
that fall under the INF Treaty’s definition of ground-based cruise missiles.
"Notably,
we have been pointing to the two latter violations of the INF Treaty for 15
years," the ministry said. "But there is no constructive
reaction.".
Russia’s
foreign ministry has warned the United States about inadmissibility of
strengthening its own security at the expense of other countries.
"While
implementing its anti-missile plans, the United States must be guided, in deed
but not in words, by the generally recognized principle of inadmissibility of
strengthening own security at the expense of other states. Notably, Washington
has repeatedly reiterated this principle in corresponding international
formats," the ministry said on Saturday commenting on the latest regular
report of the US Department of State on observance by states of
non-proliferation and weapons control agreeements.
The
ministry reminded that the United States withdrew from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic
Missile Treaty in 2001 to embark on the course towards unilateral and
unrestricted building up of its global anti-missile defense system. "This
way it has wrecked on of the pillars of the global strategic stability
system," the ministry stressed.
Threat to international security
"The
US’ deployment of its missile-defense system has adversely impacted the system of
international security, dramatically complicated relations not only in the
Euro-Atlantic but also in the Asia-Pacific region and turned into one of the
most serious obstacles on the path of further gradual nuclear disarmament as it
creates dangerous opportunities for the resumption of the nuclear arms
race," the ministry said.
"The
danger is that the existence of an anti-missile umbrella may give rise to a
calamitous illusion of invincibility and impunity and hence tempt hotheads in
Washington into new dangerous unilateral steps on global and regional problems
in bypassing of the United Nations Security Council and contrary to common
sense, like it was done on April 7 when the United States delivered a missile
strike on a sovereign state, Syria," the ministry noted.
"We
have repeatedly drawn attention of the US side to this problem but the US side
demonstrates no readiness for cooperation and reckoning with Russia’s concerns.
The United States has refused to even discuss its own guarantees that
missile-defense systems that are being deployed in Europe are not aimed against
Russia," the ministry said.
"We
still have no answer who these super-costly missile-defense preparations are
conducted against as they are disproportional to all possible challenges.
Iran deal fails to change situation
"Demonstrative
in this respect was the US’s unwillingness to adjust its missile defense plans
despite successful implementation of the 2015 agreements on the Iranian nuclear
program," the ministry noted. "However we remember that it used to be
a core and, as a matter of fact, the only argument Washington used to justify
deployment of its anti-missile systems in Europe."
"Anti-missile
elements that are being deployed around the world are part of a very dangerous
global project aimed at securing US’ overall overwhelming superiority to the
prejudice of security interests of other states," the Russian foreign
ministry underscored. "The US missile defense architecture is tilting the
strategic balance of forces in the area of offensive weapons and creates more
and more serious risks of global instability.".
CFE Treaty
Russia
sees no point in getting back to the subject of the implementation of the
absolutely obsolete Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE Treaty), the
ministry says.
"Since
the authors of the report once again mentioned Russia’s suspension of its
participation in the Treaty on Conventional Forces in Europe presenting it as a
‘violation’ of liabilities under this treaty, we should remind the following:
the United States and its allies have more than once violated restrictive
provisions of the CFE Treaty through NATO’s expansion," the ministry said.
"Moreover, they have been dodging Russia’s initiative to upgrade the
regime of control over conventional weapons in Europe in compliance with the
new military political realities on the continent. The most vivid example is
their refusal to ratify an agreement on adaptation of the CFE Treaty."
"Bearing
in mind all these circumstances, we see no sense in getting back to the subject
of the implementation of the CFE Treaty which has long gone obsolete," the
ministry said. "As for the prospects for a new regime of control over
conventional weapons in Europe on the principles of equal and indivisible
security, balanced rights and liabilities of the parties, they should be looked
at in the context of NATO’s abandoning measures of military "containment’
of Russia in Europe, normalization of relations with Russia, including in the
sphere of military cooperation."
The
Russian foreign ministry reminded that only after Russia had suspended the CFE
Treaty, the United States and its allies raised the issue of the
"necessity to solve the problem of control over conventional weapons in
Europe." "But their attempts to use dialogue on this matter as a tool
to exert pressure on Russia have in the long run led to its suspension,"
the ministry explained.
"Stating
their commitment to preserving, strengthening and modernization of control over
conventional weapons in Europe, the United States and NATO have actually
embarked on a course towards ‘containing’ Russia and further tilting the
balance of forces in Europe in their favor, including in the exact vicinity of
the Russian borders," the ministry pointed. "US’ attempts at
‘flexible’ interpretation of the provisions of the Russia-NATO Founding Act
along with building up heavy weapons and military hardware at NATO’s European
advanced deployment depots are nothing but dangerous balancing on the verge of
violating provisions of this most important document.".
US military biological infrastructure in
neighboring countries
Moscow
is alarmed over the deployment of the United States’ military biological
infrastructure along its borders, the foreign ministry says.
"We
cannot but be concerned over systemic deployment of the US’ military biological
infrastructure along the Russian borders," the ministry said. "Of
special worry is reinforcing of the US Army Medical Research Directorate -
Georgia (in the village of Alexeyevka)."
"Pentagon
is implementing similar projects in other our neighboring countries," the
ministry said.
Despite
its liabilities, the United States still leaves room for possible
"retaliatory use" of toxic and other types of chemical weapons.
"It creates a rather alarming situation around the US’ observance of
liabilities under the BWC [Convention on the Prohibition of the Development,
Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons
and on their Destruction - TASS]," the ministry added.
Russia is not reviewing its stance on role of
nuclear weapons
Allegations
that Russia is reviewing its stance on the role of nuclear weapons are not
true, the Russian foreign ministry says.
"Concurrently,
the absolutely ungrounded false thesis of growing ‘Russian nuclear threat’ is
being fomented," the ministry said. "Provisions of our Military
Doctrine concerning the use of nuclear weapons are deliberately distorted.
Allegations that Russia is reviewing its views on the place and role of nuclear
weapons and is focusing on them are being inculcated onto Western
society."
"All
this has nothing to do with the real state of things," the ministry
stressed.
According
to the ministry, it is possible to speak about changing attitude to the role of
nuclear weapons only in the context of the US’ modernizing its nuclear
arsenals. "The United States plans to deploy new nuclear air bombs with
lower capacity but higher precision," the ministry noted. "Such characteristics
considerably lower the threshold of the use of nuclear weapons. Such nuclear
tools are no longer a political weapon but are rather combat weapon.".
Freeze of Russia’s tranche on IAEA projects
US
banks’ freezing of Russia’s tranche meant to finance humanitarian projects of
the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) can be seen as abuse of the
international financial system, the ministry says.
"There
is no escaping the impression that deliberate steps are being taken to create
obstacles for Russia’s financing an IAEA humanitarian project. Such actions by
US banks can be seen as abuse of the international financial system by means of
control over dollar-denominated transactions, which, in this case, does direct
harm to the operation of the United Nations system," the ministry
stressed.
The
ministry reminded that in March US banks had frozen a tranche of Russia’s
voluntary contribution to finance the implementation of the IAEA Program of
Action for Cancer Therapy and the Russian bank making the payment had been
asked to confirm that the money transfer had nothing to do with Iran.
"Despite the Russia’s side explanation that the sum was meant purely for
humanitarian purposes, American banks delayed the transfer for several weeks
and returned the frozen sum to the account of the Russian state nuclear
corporation Rosatom in early April," the ministry said. "IAEA cannot
receive the Russian voluntary contribution for cancer treatment in 2017 till
now."
"We
believe that US financial institutions would hardly dare to block state
payments of a sovereign state. It looks like a free interpretation of US
government restrictions in the context of national sanctions that are
indiscriminately harming even purely humanitarian operations," the
ministry stressed. "Despite the fact that the Russian side has repeatedly
raised this issue in contacts with US officials, the US administration has
failed to explain to its banks that their steps were erroneous.".
"Joint nuclear missions"
The
United States is not observing its key liabilities under the Treaty on the
Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT Treaty) when it involves its allies
to the so-called joint nuclear missions, the Russian foreign ministry says.
"The
United States is claiming it ‘observes’ its liabilities under the NPT Treaty
but the alarming situation linked with Washington’s non-observance of key
provisions of that treaty is still in place," the ministry said. "The
United States continues to involve European non-nuclear NATO countries to the
so-called joint nuclear missions."
The
ministry reminded that such ‘joint nuclear missions’ typically include elements
of nuclear planning and drills of practical skills of the use of nuclear
weapons that involve carrier planes, their crews, infrastructure of airfield
and ground support services on non-nuclear NATO states. "It is a direct
violation of Articles I and II of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of
Nuclear Weapons," the ministry stressed.
According
to the Russian foreign ministry, the problem of joint nuclear mission has only
one solution that is to pull all non-strategic nuclear weapons back to the US
territory and ban their deployment abroad, eliminate the entire infrastructure
that can be used for quick deployment of such weapons, and, "of course, to
refrain from any exercises linked with drilling skills of the use of nuclear
weapons by the armed forces of state that don’t possess such weapons.".
Iraq, Syria
Russia
calls on the United States to share with the United Nations Security Council
data on the presumable use of chemical weapons in Iraq and Syria, the Russian
foreign ministry says.
"The
United States should demonstrate a more responsible approach to the issue of
the use of chemical weapons in the Middle East by non-state entities," the
ministry said. "And for these ends, it should simply act in compliance
with its liabilities under United Nations Security Council Resolutions 2118,
2209 and 2235 and share with the United Nations Security Council evidence to
crimes committed by Islamic State and other terrorist groups in Iraqi Kurdistan
collected by the US military in 2015-2016 directly in the sites where
extremists used these toxic agents."
"We
would also like to see ‘irrefutable’ proof that chemical weapons that were
allegedly used in an attack on Khan Shaykhun [a city in the Syrian Idlib
Governorate] had been stored at the Syrian airbase in Shayrat in order to
understand why Washington acted in violation of international law over the
presumable chemical incident in Idlib," the ministry added.
Instead,
the United States has blocked a decision of the Executive Council of the
Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons on organizing an objective
investigation in Khan Shaykhun, the ministry said, adding that the United
States has not yet provided information about the elimination of chemical
weapons seized in Iraq back in 2003-2009.
Russia wants US to explain violations in arms
control sphere
Russian
expects explanations from Washington on violation of its liabilities in the
sphere of arms control, the Russian foreign ministry says.
"We
want to hear articulate explanations on all episodes we mentioned and call on
the United States once again to abandon its unseemly practices of laying
ungrounded claims to other states on the backdrop of its own serious
‘drawbacks’ and this way misleading international public opinion," the
ministry said.
"We
also express the hope that Washington will finally returns to the time-tested
efficient way of settling disputable issues and differences, i.e. full-format
talks with all-round consideration of the core of problems, without
politically-motivated biases and grandstanding through throwing ungrounded
accusations," the ministry added.
The
ministry cited US’ violations of its liabilities under other agreements,
including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the Intermediate-Range Nuclear
Forces Treaty, as well as problems with the implementation of US’ liabilities
in the sphere of control over conventional, chemical and biological weapons,
and the Open Skies Treaty.
Standing
for formal observance of liabilities in the sphere of arms control, the United
States is giving dogmatic assessment to the actions of other states in
violation of international practices of settling such issues, the Russian
foreign ministry pointed. "In the recent years, there have been more and
more grounds to think that such US’ actions are rooted not in trivial
unwillingness to put itself to the bother of maintaining an uneasy and long
expert dialogue but rather in something more serious - Washington’s fear to be
caught in throwing ungrounded accusations against other states and in violating
international arms control and non-proliferation agreements," the Russian
ministry stressed.
Source: ITAR-TASS 30-04-2017